literature

Understanding the Transcendent

Deviation Actions

Berhane-Negus's avatar
Published:
593 Views

Literature Text

UNDERSTANDING THE TRANSCENDENT EXPERIENCE
By: Spencer Pennington

In the film Contact several heavy social, theological, spiritual, and personal questions are dealt with.  There is of course the question of “Are we alone in the Universe?”  Then there is the follow-up question, “If we are not alone, where do Humans sit in the Universe?  What is our importance?”  The other great questions in the film are much more personal in nature: “Is there a God, and if so, what is God?  Did God create both us and the aliens?” Perhaps the most perplexing question though is that of “How do we explain and justify the transcendent experience?”

The film does this by showing the double-edged nature of skepticism: Skepticism is displayed as a means of analyzing and strengthening one's own faith through questioning and examination.  However, it is also shown as being a possible block to the great realm of the transcendent, the spiritual, where explanation is beyond science and conventional reasoning.

Where then, do we find a middle ground?  Certainly, one could argue that it could not be in blind faith, as this would shut away the very purpose of faith itself; to believe in that which gives us strength and that which rests on solid foundations and having this blind faith would only limit us to ignorance, something that is condemned by all major religions.  Yet it could neither be at the other end of the spectrum, where Science serves as our only means of explanation, as this itself would be illogical; too many things have occurred throughout Human history to be explained solely by Science, yet to be completely ignored at the same time.  Perhaps Bishop John Shelby Spong says it best in a similar manner in his essay The Vehicle of Words: “Once this experience is put into words, with all of the limitations that this implies, the words themselves take on a life of their own.” However, based on the course of Human history, we can be sure that something within all of these events did occur.

History’s greatest examples of this lie in the transcendent experiences in the early stages of the world’s major religions.  In Christianity, for example, the Gospels tell us that Jesus was approached and tempted by Satan three times.  In Judaism, Moses is alone in the desert when approached by God in the form of a burning bush.  In Islam, Muhammad is meditating in a cave on the Mountain of Light in Arabia when approached by Gabriel and commanded to become the next of God’s Messengers.  In Buddhism, the Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama sits beneath a bodhi tree in India, tempted by the evil within himself, challenged with overcoming it before he can, and finally does attain Enlightenment or “Nirvana”.

Can these things be proven strictly by science?  No.  There are no fossilized footprints of Jesus in the desert; there are no remains of a burnt bush in Egypt that can be traced to Moses; there is no “radiation” or form of physical or tangible energy to prove Muhammad’s encounter with Gabriel; there is no archeological imprint of the Buddha underneath the bodhi tree where he was said to have reached Enlightenment.  But we must then ask ourselves: can these things be completely disproved or discounted by Science.  Again, the answer is no.  We need only to look at the development of these religions and the impact that they have had upon humanity, both good and bad, to know that something did indeed occur.  Could something so earth-shaking and history-altering be based on pure untruth?  To say yes to that, some might argue, could also be unscientific because it rules out the fact that something must have occurred in order for Human history to develop in the way that it has.

The theological implications, validities, and nature of these events could be (and have been) debated for centuries.  Those are questions to which we may never know the answer; things that Science may never prove.  But perhaps this is where faith comes in, not of a blind nature, but of an objective one: From these great experiences of transcendence, we are able to see the true presence of God all around us – When we examine openly, questioningly, and objectively, we are able to draw our own understanding of transcendence.  Thus, we may be able to understand Christ when he said “The Kingdom of God is within you,” or the Qur’an’s words in Sura 50, verse 16 that “God is closer to man than his jugular vein.”

Thus, the key may be then, not to believe or disbelieve all of or any of the transcendent events that are presented to us, but to approach them equally with the same respect and integrity that we may study them for ourselves and form our own beliefs about them with a scientific mind in terms of being objective and open.  In Contact Dr. Ellie Arroway’s experience meant nothing to those that had her on trial; when they looked, they saw nothing, and why should they?  Her experience didn’t affect them or their views, nor should it based simply on her words.  Perhaps, though, there was one inescapable truth that they did not see: That regardless of God, religion, spirituality, or theology, something truly transcendent had occurred for Ellie and thus something did happen.  This does not make her experience more or less valid, but certainly, one can honestly and understandably come to the conclusion that something did occur based not on Ellie’s story or the way she said it, based not on her scientific degrees, but based on the change evident in her as a person.  Perhaps, then, what is needed is objectivity and respect and the ability to think for ourselves in careful, analytical ways.  As Heather Keith and Steven Fesmire note about Ellie in their essay Our Place in the Cosmos: Faith and Belief in Contact: “Rejecting blind faith, even in her own experience, Ellie finds meaning in examining her beliefs by embracing and encouraging doubt wherever possible.”  Yet maybe it begins all with us and our ability to perceive.

In the words of Van Morrison: “No guru, no method, no teacher…just you and I nature…and the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost…in the garden.”

Spencer Pennington
June, 2007

Work Cited:

Spong, John Shelby.  “The Vehicle of Words – An Unsteady Ship.” Resurrection: Myth or Reality?  A Bishop’s Search for the Origins of Christianity.  New York, New York.  Harper Collins Publishers, 1994

Amjad, Moiz.  “Where is Allah?.” Understanding Islam.  www.understanding-islam.com/re…, 1998

Keith, Heather and Fesmire, Steven.  “Our Place in the Cosmos: Faith and Belief in Contact.” Class handout, Geary.  English 4, 2007

Morrison, Van.  “The Best of Van Morrison, Volume 2.” Lyrics from “In the Garden.” Produced by Van Morrison.  Distributed by Polydor Records, 1993
This was an essay written earlier this month for my Philosophy class as an analysis of the film "Contact". I tried to base my essay around the idea of finding some level of middle ground between science and religion in terms of explaining transcendent experiences (the full title of the essay is "Understanding the Transcendent Experience").

Anyone who knows me knows my ideas feelings and beliefs about of the world religions and many philosophies. This is not intended to offend anyone or to prove or disprove their beliefs as I point out in my essay, merely to try and observe objectively while approaching each transcendent experience with the same respect and level of personal spiritual validity for regardless of belief or disbelief.

Also, I have written it in a way so that those who have seen the film will understand the essay's relationship to the film, but also so that those who have not seen it will be able to understand the basic message of the essay.

Enjoy.

Preview image: Woodcut print of the monk Bodhidharma (commonly thought to be the founder of Zen Buddhism) by Tsukioka Yoshitoshi, 1887. Found here: [link]
© 2007 - 2024 Berhane-Negus
Comments25
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
cairnthecrow's avatar
You make many good points here. Skepticism, while happily preventing the tragedy of blind faith, can also lead to a needlessly cynical view that can have many holes in its explanation. I particularly love the point about religion and science being able to go hand in hand; too often I see one or the other uplifted and the other mocked. Do you know -when our eighth grade class was asked if we believed in creationism, about fifteen hands went up, but when asked the same about evolution, my hand was alone. I believe in both, to some extent, but apparently the notion of hard science was a foreign one to my peers at the time. Why is it that throughout history, the church has appeared determined to crush what it saw as "opposition?" While I haven't studied Islam, it seems to me that I really ought to -the East seems to have a stronger tradition of logic and acceptance, rather than rigid preaching.

Science is unable to prove some things -thus far. And as it reveals the workings behind more of the world's secrets, the tales of religion are validated quite often. Logic and reason don't have to be absent from religion; it's the strict doctrine that some humans choose to clothe it in that makes it so.

In an ideal world, doubt would fuel creativity and a need to know the why of how the world works. I doubt, however, that that day shall ever come; indeed, I hope it does not, for nothing good can ever come of perfection -after all, without flaws, what are we?

Beautiful essay; I can see that I'm going to have to spend more time browsing through your gallery. :D